Retrofitting fiber cement boards onto existing buildings is rarely straightforward. Unlike new-build projects, refurbishment works must adapt to unknown, inconsistent, and often non-compliant substructures that were never designed to receive modern cladding systems.
Fiber cement boards are widely specified for their durability, non-combustibility, and resistance to rot. Yet many long-term façade failures attributed to “installation errors” or “paint defects” share a deeper, less discussed root cause: moisture cycling fatigue. This phenomenon rarely causes early failure.
Ordering a full container of fiber cement boards is a major commitment. Once production starts and the container is loaded, mistakes become expensive, time-consuming, and difficult to reverse.
Many buyers experience problems not because fiber cement boards are a bad product,
Fiber cement boards are strong and durable when installed correctly. Yet many projects experience fiber cement board transport damage, where boards arrive cracked, broken, or chipped before installation even begins.
When choosing construction materials, price often feels like the safest decision factor. Fiber cement boards are no exception. At first glance, cheaper boards seem to offer the same thickness, similar appearance, and comparable specifications.
Fiber cement boards are widely known for their durability, fire resistance, and long service life. However, many failures on construction sites are not caused by incorrect installation or transport conditions alone, but by poor fiber cement board density.